Eeeeg. This is disorienting. I'm noticing a post rating feature - do members get to use this, or is it just moderators? If all members do, I encourage everyone to start rating up informative posts.
I don't like the position of names - they're too far from the actual post text itself. I'm thinking it should be something more like
[avatar] [user name] on [date]:
[misc data] [post content]
OH WOW THE NEW CODE BOX IS WONDERFUL. I've been using [
box] mainly because I didn't like the ugly bar that says "CODE" above it, and this fixes my complaints completely!
Nathan, on 12 June 2009 - 10:01 AM, said:
I'll be making a custom template in the coming weeks.
Too bad they didn't do the same to the quote box. With your custom template, do you think you could make NTBB-style quote boxes?
Something like:
[user name] wrote: [date - gray - linked to post]
| [message]
Hmm. I think this is also a bit wide. Stretching the whole width makes me uncomfortable - I think the old WHS was better, at ~80% wide.
Any IPS
desperately needs competent interfacers. This is
exactly the same interface layout as IPB 2.0, except with new features tacked on badly. Their designers have done some nice work on it, so it doesn't look
ugly, but it still looks unnecessarily complex. It needs a significantly better UI.